clock menu more-arrow no yes

Filed under:

Auburn football: Football Outsiders less optimistic on Tigers compared to NCAA Football 14

Hmm, who should we trust? Acclaimed football experts or video game makers?

Lauren Barnard photo

On Tuesday, EA Sports released its team ratings for all 126 FBS teams, and Auburn came out looking pretty good. SB Nation college football savant Jason Kirk compared those ratings to Football Outsiders' F/+ projections. Kirk adjusted FO's scale to match EA's, and as expected, the Tigers slid down the board.

SEC overall NCAA 14 ratings compared to F/+ projections
Team EA F/+ Diff
Alabama 99 96 -3
LSU 93 94 +1
Florida 90 93 +3
Georgia 91 92 +1
South Carolina 90 91 +1
Texas A&M 91 91 0
Ole Miss 90 86 -4
Missouri 88 85 -3
Arkansas 88 82 -6
Tennessee 86 82 -4
Vanderbilt 83 81 -2
Auburn 88 80 -8
Mississippi State 88 80 -8
Kentucky 84 75 -9

What to take away from this? Well, the top of the SEC -- Alabama excluded -- may be better than EA Sports is anticipating. Four of the five best teams have better F/+ ratings than EA ratings, and Alabama's only sees a drop because the Crimson Tide received the highest rating possible from EA.

But once you get past the top of the conference, EA Sports is probably overrating the SEC, and Auburn is no exception. The Tigers' -9 differential is tied for second-widest gap among the 14 teams, and the F/+ rating of 80 feels a little more authentic. Coming off a 3-9 season, it's hard to imagine the Tigers taking such a big step in the right direction, especially when you consider EA rated Ellis Johnson's defense as a 90, tied for third-best in the conference.

So yeah, the real football experts aren't as high on the Tigers compared to the video game makers. Unfortunately, it's best to allow your perception of the 2013 team to be influenced by Football Outsiders and not EA Sports.

Share on Fancred